Det er uansett Bernie Sanders som blir president. Han kommer til å banke Trump også som ikke engang greier å få navnene rett på laget som spiller i Superbowl eller hvor de amerikanske statene finner seg på kartet.

Ingen vil ta USA seriøst med en president som ser ut som Alfred E. Newman i tøysebladet MAD.

Hehe...

Han er jo snart 80 år. Uaktuell.

DEMS IN PANIC MODE

Hillary/Comey 2020

Tror du Trump skriver selv?

Butterdeig er et tips.

Primærvalg opplegget i Iowa er jo fullstendig latterlig. Hvorfor kan de ikke stemme på vanlig måte?
Folk møter opp i en gymsal og stiller seg i hjørnet til sin foretrukne kandidat. Deretter teller man hvor mange som står sammen hos de forskjellige representantene. Om det er færre enn 15% i et hjørne blir disse annulert og denne flokken må finne seg en annen kandidat å stille seg bak.

What are the Iowa caucuses, and how do they work? All you need to know

It isn’t a secret ballot. In that venue, a representative for each candidate will be standing in a certain area of the room.

Voters have to go and stand in the area where their candidate is represented. So Joe Biden supporters would be in one corner, Elizabeth Warren’s in another, and Bernie Sanders supporters in another. Everyone is tallied.

For the Democratic caucuses, in particular, second choices are important. If a particular candidate does not attract 15% of total voters present, they are not seen as “viable” and are taken off the ballot, leaving their voters free to throw their weight behind another candidate. For example, a Pete Buttigieg supporter could sidle over to the Warren area.

Once the bartering for supporters is over, the votes are totted up, and state delegates are awarded to each candidate proportionately. That, in turn, determines how many national convention delegates each candidate receives.



https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/feb/03/iowa-caucuses-2020-elections-candidates

Hørtes ut som en fin ordning. Her i Norge er det ennå enklere, her kan du stemme hva du vil og resultatet blir det samme uansett.

'It’s a total meltdown': Confusion seizes Iowa as officials struggle to report results

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/03/iowa-caucus-2020-election-110600

Har ikke Hillary hakket valget?
#Fool Fønix

hakke peiling

Du venter på dummen?
#etterfusking kaoselection

One percent joe/baby joe kjøpte inn en kinesisk app, som skulle garantere ham nominasjons-seier.

Schifty schitt påstår at DT kjøpte en bug.....

DT må skrive om State of Union talen .

"DT må skrive om State of Union talen"

Tror ikke de skal la han skrive noe som helst. La han heller lese opp det andre har skrevet med sin monotone teleprompter stemme så vil alle trumpetister i morgen gråte en skvett og skryte over hvor presidental dear leader oppførte seg fordi han ikke benyttet anledningen til å mobbe og trakassere sine konkurrenter.

DT har perfekte telefonsamtaler og enda bedre taler.
Virker som du sitter med Hillarymaske og Clintonbriller og lytter til ekko inni beskyttelsesdrakten dems.
#somed virus

Jabba og dems har gått på en ny kjempesmell.
I dag blir sirkus schumer shify schitt sham cover up show avsluttet
DT holder en suveren state of union tale
Valgfusket til Hillarry maffiossos blir avslørt for hele verden. Iowa nominasjonen er rigget av DNC

"I dag blir sirkus schumer shify schitt sham cover up show avsluttet"

Mitt tips er at DT ikke vil bruke de tradisjonelle kallenavnene i kveld og at du vil være fra deg av begeistring over hvor presidental DT oppførte seg.

Talen i kveld var veldig god og fremføringen nesten perfekt, det kan jeg slå fast allerede nå utifra erfaringen med slike taler.

DT er den suverene folkevalgte presidenten, og vil gå fra sier til seier. Han holder taler med adekvat innhold, i motsetning til pratemakerne fra DEMS.

Det viktigte for demokratiske velgere er ikke innholdet i politikken, men å finne en kandidat som kan slå DT. Det er ikke mulig.
Dagbladet; Ingenting er viktigere for demokratiske velgere enn å slå Trump, viser velgerundersøkelser. Det er så altoverskyggende at klima og helse kommer langt etter = De er kun drevet av HAT. Det har gjort dem blinde, slik som Jabba & co

FAKE NEWS WAKE UP

Her er en oppdatering fra IOWA
Live look at the Democrat Party doing 'quality control'

https://twitter.com/i/status/1224540101600010241

SIRKUS DEMS

Iowa caucus vote totals delayed amid 'inconsistencies'; campaigns lash out at 'crazy' state party

The Iowa Democratic Party (IDP) still has not reported official vote totals in the critical Iowa caucuses as of early Tuesday morning, in a largely unexplained and unprecedented delay that has raised questions about the legitimacy of the contest -- and campaign officials are livid,

Video link:https://video.foxnews.com/v/6129403509001

Alle fem dems sirkus klovner mener å ha "vunnet" nominasjonsvalget. Er det FAKE NEWS? Alle fem???

E9 med Cinet. Komplett kaos.

Fredrik fake news;

"Hvem kan slå Donald Trump?
De mest venstreradikale kan skremme selv den tøffeste cowboy på høylys dag."
"selv om det ikke er lagt frem bevis for at Biden har gjort noe galt. Han er heller ikke under etterforskning for korrupsjon, hverken i Ukraina eller USA."

Er det mulig å skrive noe slik sprøyt?

Politisk innhold teller ikke for DEMS. De er kun drevet av HAT.

FREDRIK FAKE NEWS- WAKE UP

SIRKUS DEMS;

Campaigns have been told tonight to not expect any results from the Iowa caucuses until at some point on Tuesday, two officials tell CNN."

Tuesday of this week or next week? :)

BREAKING NEWS

Tens of thousands of ballots all for Joe Biden being shipped to Iowa from Broward County Florida as we speak. “Don’t worry folks we got this covered” DNC operatives.

BREAKING NEWS FROM IOWA;

“Hillary Clinton is reported the winner of the Iowa caucus.”

Democrat party meltdown.

They can’t even run a caucus and they want to run the government.
😳


No thank you.

DEMS EASY TO USE TOOLS....

The mobile app that appears to have caused problems during the Iowa presidential caucuses was built by a small Washington, D.C.-based company called Shadow Inc., the tech arm connected to nonprofit progressive digital strategy firm Acronym, according to people familiar with the matter.

State records show that the Iowa Democratic Party paid Shadow a little more than $63,000 over two payments in November and December. Shadow describes itself as a company that builds “affordable and easy-to-use tools” for progressives, according to its website.

In a statement, the Iowa Democratic Party said there had been no evidence of a hack of the app. The party hasn’t publicly disclosed the identity of the app’s creator, a decision that previously prompted alarm from cybersecurity experts.

In a statement late Monday, Acronym distanced itself from Shadow, saying it was one of a number of investors in the company. Acronym also said it was “reading confirmed reports of Shadow’s work with the Iowa Democratic Party on Twitter” and awaiting more information from the party about what had happened. Last year, Acronym’s Chief Executive Tara McGowan said it was launching Shadow as part of an acquisition of a political customer-relationship management tool.

The problems that surfaced Monday deeply frustrated party officials in Iowa, where voting was supposed to have wrapped up hours ago. Some precinct chairs struggled to transmit caucus results, according to people familiar with the situation, both via a mobile app and by a backup telephone system.

The state party said last month that it would record votes from the Iowa caucuses using the smartphone app because they said it would be easier and faster to report results from some 1,700 caucus sites.

The app was intended to help the precinct chairs record the results from each round of voting and take care of the delegate math. Then the precinct chair was supposed to use the app to send the results to the Iowa Democratic Party.

But critics expressed concern about the reliability of the app given security concerns around the 2020 elections. Cybersecurity experts also roundly criticized the Iowa Democratic Party’s decision to not identify the app maker publicly or allow it to be subject to open security and reliability testing.

The cybersecurity wing of the Department of Homeland Security recently offered to do some security testing on the app but the Iowa Democratic Party declined the outreach, according to people familiar with the matter. DHS declined to comment on the app, referring questions to the Iowa Democratic Party. After being sent multiple requests for comment, a spokeswoman for the Iowa Democratic Party said that she was checking about this and would circle back.

The state party has defended its plan, with officials saying in January that they were confident in their security systems and that if there were errors, the party would be able to correct them because there would also be paper records of the votes.

Monday’s challenges were the latest example of the perils that can result when technology is introduced to the voting process. Though digitized election equipment can often streamline vote tabulation and reporting, it introduces often unforeseen vulnerabilities that can shake public trust in the democratic process—a concern that has been top of mind for election officials since Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential contest.

Last summer, the Iowa Democratic Party dropped plans to allow voting by phone—so-called “virtual caucuses”—after the party’s national committee objected to the proposal due to security concerns.

The apparent app mishap wasn’t the first time that the Democratic Party has faced technical issues due to a vendor. In 2018 the party’s national committee had to walk back the announcement of a suspected attempt to hack its voter database after it learned the issue was a false alarm set off by a security firm that detected a phishing test built by DigiDems, a volunteer group of technology experts that does work for Democrats.

HAR HILLARY KJØPT INN APPEN FRA KINA ELLER PUTIN??????

Bananrepublikk. Plastikkdemokrati. En vits hele greia.