President Biden Announces the Build Back Better Framework
President Biden Announces the Build Back Better Framework
"...
Specifically, the Build Back Better framework will:
Deliver substantial consumer rebates and ensure middle class families save money as they shift to clean energy and electrification. The consumer rebates and credits included in the Build Back Better framework will save the average American family hundreds of dollars per year in energy costs. These measures include enhancement and expansion of existing home energy and efficiency tax credits, as well as the creation of a new, electrification-focused rebate program. The framework will cut the cost of installing rooftop solar for a home by around 30 percent, shortening the payback period by around 5 years; and the framework’s electric vehicle tax credit will lower the cost of an electric vehicle that is made in America with American materials and union labor by $12,500 for a middle-class family. In addition, the framework will help rural communities tap into the clean energy opportunity through targeted grants and loans through the Department of Agriculture.
Ensure clean energy technology – from wind turbine blades to solar panels to electric cars – will be built in the United States with American made steel and other materials, creating hundreds of thousands of good jobs here at home. The Build Back Better legislation will target incentives to grow domestic supply chains in solar, wind, and other critical industries in communities on the frontlines of the energy transition. In addition, the framework will boost the competitiveness of existing industries, like steel, cement, and aluminum, through grants, loans, tax credits, and procurement to drive capital investment in the decarbonization and revitalization of American manufacturing.
Advance environmental justice through a new Clean Energy and Sustainability Accelerator that will invest in projects around the country, while delivering 40% of the benefits of investment to disadvantaged communities, as part of the President’s Justice40 initiative. The framework will also fund port electrification; facilitate the deployment of cleaner transit, buses, and trucks; and support critical community capacity building, including grants to environmental justice communities. In addition, the framework will create a new Civilian Climate Corps – with over 300,000 members that look like America. This diverse new workforce will conserve our public lands, bolster community resilience, and address the changing climate, all while putting good-paying union jobs within reach for more Americans.
..."
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/10/28/president-biden-announces-the-build-back-better-framework/
OCTOBER 28, 2021
______________________
PRINT 17
RULES COMMITTEE PRINT 117–17
TEXT OF H.R. 5376, BUILD BACK BETTER ACT
[Showing the text of H.R. 5376, as reported by the Committee]
https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-117HR5376RH-RCP117-17.pdf
OCTOBER 29, 2021
SIDE 1320 -> SIDE 1321
______________________
PRINT 18 - SENESTE
RULES COMMITTEE PRINT 117–18
TEXT OF H.R. 5376, BUILD BACK BETTER ACT
https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-117HR5376RH-RCP117-18.pdf
NOVEMBER 3, 2021
SIDE 1561 -> SIDE 1562
"
..
‘‘SEC. 45AA. ADVANCED MANUFACTURING PRODUCTION CREDIT.
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—
‘‘(1) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—For purposes of section 38, the advanced manufacturing production credit for any taxable year is an amount equal to the sum of the credit amounts determined under sub13 section (b) with respect to each eligible component which is— ‘
‘(A) produced by such taxpayer, and
‘‘(B) during the taxable year, sold by the taxpayer to an unrelated person. ‘‘
(2) PRODUCTION AND SALE MUST BE IN TRADE OR BUSINESS.—Any eligible component pro20 duced and sold by the taxpayer shall be taken into account only if the production and sale described in paragraph (1) is in a trade or business of the tax23 payer. ‘‘(3) UNRELATED PERSON.—For purposes of this subsection, a taxpayer shall be treated as selling components to an unrelated person if such compo nent is sold to such person by a person related to the taxpayer.
‘‘(b) CREDIT AMOUNT.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (3), the amount determined under this subsection with respect to any eligible component, including any eli gible component it incorporates, shall be equal to—
...
‘‘(C) in the case of solar grade polysilicon, $3 per kilogram,
"
___________________
Preliminary Estimates Show Build Back Better Legislation Will Reduce Deficits
https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/preliminary-estimates-show-build-back-better-legislation-will-reduce-deficits
NOVEMBER 4, 2021
"
The Build Back Better Act invests meaningfully in American families and workers, while laying the foundation for meeting imperative climate goals. When the President released the Build Back Better framework last week, he proposed $2 trillion in savings that would more than pay for the critical investments in the legislation – and in fact generate net deficit reduction. With the release of the text of the Build Back Better Act in the House and scoring from the Joint Committee on Taxation, we can update the estimate of fiscal savings.
The legislation would, as the President proposed, generate more than $2 trillion in savings. These savings come from ensuring large multinational corporations and wealthy Americans pay their fair share and reducing the cost of prescription drugs. These provisions will not raise taxes on any taxpayer making less than $400,000.
The table below includes the latest estimates by the Joint Committee on Taxation, Congressional Budget Office, and the Treasury Department of the revenue raising and savings provisions in the bill. The bottom line is that the Build Back Better Act under consideration in the House of Representatives will be fully paid for and reduce the deficit.
...
"
___________________
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE (CBO) ESTIMATES
https://www.cbo.gov/cost-estimates
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title I, Committee on Agriculture, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57618
NOVEMBER 15, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title II, Committee on Education and Labor, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57622
NOVEMBER 17, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title III, Committee on Energy and Commerce, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57623
NOVEMBER 18, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title IV, Committee on Financial Services, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57619
NOVEMBER 15, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title IV, Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, for the Senate Amendment to H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57681
DECEMBER 8, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title V, Committee on Homeland Security, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57607
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title VI, Committee on the Judiciary, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57625
NOVEMBER 18, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title VII, Committee on Natural Resources, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57621
NOVEMBER 17, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title VIII, Committee on Oversight and Reform, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57611
NOVEMBER 12, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title VIII, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, for the Senate Amendment to H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57678
DECEMBER 8, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title IX, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57608
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title X, Committee on Small Business, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57605
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title X, Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, for the Senate Amendment to H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57680
DECEMBER 8, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title XI, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57490
NOVEMBER 12, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title XI, Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, for the Senate Amendment to H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57679
DECEMBER 8, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title XII, Committee on Veterans Affairs, H.R. 5376, Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57604
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title XIII, Committee on Ways and Means, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57626
NOVEMBER 18, 2021
"...
Specifically, the Build Back Better framework will:
Deliver substantial consumer rebates and ensure middle class families save money as they shift to clean energy and electrification. The consumer rebates and credits included in the Build Back Better framework will save the average American family hundreds of dollars per year in energy costs. These measures include enhancement and expansion of existing home energy and efficiency tax credits, as well as the creation of a new, electrification-focused rebate program. The framework will cut the cost of installing rooftop solar for a home by around 30 percent, shortening the payback period by around 5 years; and the framework’s electric vehicle tax credit will lower the cost of an electric vehicle that is made in America with American materials and union labor by $12,500 for a middle-class family. In addition, the framework will help rural communities tap into the clean energy opportunity through targeted grants and loans through the Department of Agriculture.
Ensure clean energy technology – from wind turbine blades to solar panels to electric cars – will be built in the United States with American made steel and other materials, creating hundreds of thousands of good jobs here at home. The Build Back Better legislation will target incentives to grow domestic supply chains in solar, wind, and other critical industries in communities on the frontlines of the energy transition. In addition, the framework will boost the competitiveness of existing industries, like steel, cement, and aluminum, through grants, loans, tax credits, and procurement to drive capital investment in the decarbonization and revitalization of American manufacturing.
Advance environmental justice through a new Clean Energy and Sustainability Accelerator that will invest in projects around the country, while delivering 40% of the benefits of investment to disadvantaged communities, as part of the President’s Justice40 initiative. The framework will also fund port electrification; facilitate the deployment of cleaner transit, buses, and trucks; and support critical community capacity building, including grants to environmental justice communities. In addition, the framework will create a new Civilian Climate Corps – with over 300,000 members that look like America. This diverse new workforce will conserve our public lands, bolster community resilience, and address the changing climate, all while putting good-paying union jobs within reach for more Americans.
..."
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/10/28/president-biden-announces-the-build-back-better-framework/
OCTOBER 28, 2021
______________________
PRINT 17
RULES COMMITTEE PRINT 117–17
TEXT OF H.R. 5376, BUILD BACK BETTER ACT
[Showing the text of H.R. 5376, as reported by the Committee]
https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-117HR5376RH-RCP117-17.pdf
OCTOBER 29, 2021
SIDE 1320 -> SIDE 1321
______________________
PRINT 18 - SENESTE
RULES COMMITTEE PRINT 117–18
TEXT OF H.R. 5376, BUILD BACK BETTER ACT
https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-117HR5376RH-RCP117-18.pdf
NOVEMBER 3, 2021
SIDE 1561 -> SIDE 1562
"
..
‘‘SEC. 45AA. ADVANCED MANUFACTURING PRODUCTION CREDIT.
‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—
‘‘(1) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—For purposes of section 38, the advanced manufacturing production credit for any taxable year is an amount equal to the sum of the credit amounts determined under sub13 section (b) with respect to each eligible component which is— ‘
‘(A) produced by such taxpayer, and
‘‘(B) during the taxable year, sold by the taxpayer to an unrelated person. ‘‘
(2) PRODUCTION AND SALE MUST BE IN TRADE OR BUSINESS.—Any eligible component pro20 duced and sold by the taxpayer shall be taken into account only if the production and sale described in paragraph (1) is in a trade or business of the tax23 payer. ‘‘(3) UNRELATED PERSON.—For purposes of this subsection, a taxpayer shall be treated as selling components to an unrelated person if such compo nent is sold to such person by a person related to the taxpayer.
‘‘(b) CREDIT AMOUNT.—
‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (3), the amount determined under this subsection with respect to any eligible component, including any eli gible component it incorporates, shall be equal to—
...
‘‘(C) in the case of solar grade polysilicon, $3 per kilogram,
"
___________________
Preliminary Estimates Show Build Back Better Legislation Will Reduce Deficits
https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/preliminary-estimates-show-build-back-better-legislation-will-reduce-deficits
NOVEMBER 4, 2021
"
The Build Back Better Act invests meaningfully in American families and workers, while laying the foundation for meeting imperative climate goals. When the President released the Build Back Better framework last week, he proposed $2 trillion in savings that would more than pay for the critical investments in the legislation – and in fact generate net deficit reduction. With the release of the text of the Build Back Better Act in the House and scoring from the Joint Committee on Taxation, we can update the estimate of fiscal savings.
The legislation would, as the President proposed, generate more than $2 trillion in savings. These savings come from ensuring large multinational corporations and wealthy Americans pay their fair share and reducing the cost of prescription drugs. These provisions will not raise taxes on any taxpayer making less than $400,000.
The table below includes the latest estimates by the Joint Committee on Taxation, Congressional Budget Office, and the Treasury Department of the revenue raising and savings provisions in the bill. The bottom line is that the Build Back Better Act under consideration in the House of Representatives will be fully paid for and reduce the deficit.
...
"
___________________
CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE (CBO) ESTIMATES
https://www.cbo.gov/cost-estimates
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title I, Committee on Agriculture, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57618
NOVEMBER 15, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title II, Committee on Education and Labor, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57622
NOVEMBER 17, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title III, Committee on Energy and Commerce, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57623
NOVEMBER 18, 2021
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57619
NOVEMBER 15, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title IV, Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, for the Senate Amendment to H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57681
DECEMBER 8, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title V, Committee on Homeland Security, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57607
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title VI, Committee on the Judiciary, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57625
NOVEMBER 18, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title VII, Committee on Natural Resources, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57621
NOVEMBER 17, 2021
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57611
NOVEMBER 12, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title VIII, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, for the Senate Amendment to H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57678
DECEMBER 8, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title IX, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57608
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57605
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title X, Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, for the Senate Amendment to H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57680
DECEMBER 8, 2021
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57490
NOVEMBER 12, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title XI, Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, for the Senate Amendment to H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57679
DECEMBER 8, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title XII, Committee on Veterans Affairs, H.R. 5376, Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57604
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title XIII, Committee on Ways and Means, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57626
NOVEMBER 18, 2021
Redigert 09.12.2021 kl 20:27
Du må logge inn for å svare
Compilation20
08.11.2021 kl 19:23
12851
President Obama delivers a speech at COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland
Har han kjøpt seg inn i REC mon tro ?? Hør ifra ca18min ut i klippet......han er en god taler !!:-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2ScHyXs50Q
Har han kjøpt seg inn i REC mon tro ?? Hør ifra ca18min ut i klippet......han er en god taler !!:-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2ScHyXs50Q
Noe annet enn å se Biden tale. Han er jo knapt tilstede i forhold :P
Meget bra tale / han sier at «BBB» pakken vil godkjennes «in the next few weeks» og at det betyr mer enn en halv trillion dollar til grønne investeringer.
«US i back».
Vel, vel - Man kan si hva man vil om Grove - men hans ressonement i at RECsi sine underliggende verdier vil bli synlige i det øyeblikk USA skal lage egne verdikjeder er godt.
Underliggende verdier er fabrikkene i ML og Butte til en samlet erstatningskost på nær 30 milliarder, patentert FBR teknologi og know how når nye anlegg skall bygges.
Jeg tror vi er nære et «tipping point» hva gjelder prising av RECsi. Eller hva sier du, Grove ? Tipper du er inne her og leser:)
«US i back».
Vel, vel - Man kan si hva man vil om Grove - men hans ressonement i at RECsi sine underliggende verdier vil bli synlige i det øyeblikk USA skal lage egne verdikjeder er godt.
Underliggende verdier er fabrikkene i ML og Butte til en samlet erstatningskost på nær 30 milliarder, patentert FBR teknologi og know how når nye anlegg skall bygges.
Jeg tror vi er nære et «tipping point» hva gjelder prising av RECsi. Eller hva sier du, Grove ? Tipper du er inne her og leser:)
Redigert 08.11.2021 kl 22:19
Du må logge inn for å svare
Onmyway
08.11.2021 kl 22:29
12349
Det er vel ikke et veldig ulogisk eller fantastisk resonnement akkurat…
turning point mener du? 😜 ta det lugnt!
Compilation20
09.11.2021 kl 10:50
11632
https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2021/11/infrastructure-bill-sent-to-president-biden-while-build-back-better-act-inches-forward/
"Husets handling om den todelte loven om infrastrukturinvesteringer og jobb og regelen for Build Back Better Act representerer konkrete fremskritt på agendaen for infrastruktur og klima i Washington, DC. Nærmere bestemt er lovforslaget om topartsinfrastruktur på vei til Det hvite hus for president Bidens underskrift inneholder viktige nye retningslinjer og føderale investeringer som vil akselerere den storskala overføringen vi trenger for å bygge et moderne og avkarbonisert nett," sa Gregory Wetstone, president og administrerende direktør for American Council on Renewable Energy, i en uttalelse. «I tillegg åpner godkjenningen av regelen for Build Back Better Act for en kortsiktig gulvavstemning om Build Back Better Act, hvis avgiftsplattform for ren energi legger et troverdig grunnlag for utslippsreduksjonene vi vet vi kommer til å trenge. for å oppfylle våre globale klimaforpliktelser.»
Det nærmer seg,godtfolk !! Hvor lenge tør du vente før dette virkelig tar fyr ?? FOMO !!!!!
"Husets handling om den todelte loven om infrastrukturinvesteringer og jobb og regelen for Build Back Better Act representerer konkrete fremskritt på agendaen for infrastruktur og klima i Washington, DC. Nærmere bestemt er lovforslaget om topartsinfrastruktur på vei til Det hvite hus for president Bidens underskrift inneholder viktige nye retningslinjer og føderale investeringer som vil akselerere den storskala overføringen vi trenger for å bygge et moderne og avkarbonisert nett," sa Gregory Wetstone, president og administrerende direktør for American Council on Renewable Energy, i en uttalelse. «I tillegg åpner godkjenningen av regelen for Build Back Better Act for en kortsiktig gulvavstemning om Build Back Better Act, hvis avgiftsplattform for ren energi legger et troverdig grunnlag for utslippsreduksjonene vi vet vi kommer til å trenge. for å oppfylle våre globale klimaforpliktelser.»
Det nærmer seg,godtfolk !! Hvor lenge tør du vente før dette virkelig tar fyr ?? FOMO !!!!!
manman01
10.11.2021 kl 06:34
11274
manman01 skrev https://www.cbo.gov/cost-estimates Hvis i vil være med :)
[BLOG] CBO’s Schedule for Releasing a Cost Estimate for H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57601
NOVEMBER 9, 2021
“
The Congressional Budget Office is in the process of preparing a cost estimate for the current version of H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act (Rules Committee Print 117-18 incorporating a manager’s amendment by Congressman Yarmuth). Over the past several months, we have provided technical assistance to committees as they developed their proposals for various parts of the bill. The analysis of the bill’s many provisions is complicated, and CBO will provide a cost estimate for the entire bill as soon as practicable.
We anticipate releasing estimates for individual titles of the bill as we complete them, some of which will be released this week. Other estimates will take longer, particularly for provisions in some titles that interact with those in other titles. When we determine a release date for the cost estimate for the entire bill, we will provide advance notice.
“
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57601
NOVEMBER 9, 2021
“
The Congressional Budget Office is in the process of preparing a cost estimate for the current version of H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act (Rules Committee Print 117-18 incorporating a manager’s amendment by Congressman Yarmuth). Over the past several months, we have provided technical assistance to committees as they developed their proposals for various parts of the bill. The analysis of the bill’s many provisions is complicated, and CBO will provide a cost estimate for the entire bill as soon as practicable.
We anticipate releasing estimates for individual titles of the bill as we complete them, some of which will be released this week. Other estimates will take longer, particularly for provisions in some titles that interact with those in other titles. When we determine a release date for the cost estimate for the entire bill, we will provide advance notice.
“
Redigert 10.11.2021 kl 06:35
Du må logge inn for å svare
t3sm
10.11.2021 kl 07:56
11066
Godt det ikke er helt rolig over dammen denne uken likevel ;-)
Etter å ha vært oppdatert på disse pakkene i flere uker er det rart når det plutselig blir stille imellom BBB hehe!
Etter å ha vært oppdatert på disse pakkene i flere uker er det rart når det plutselig blir stille imellom BBB hehe!
manman01
10.11.2021 kl 19:22
10557
Så er de første dele sluppet løs
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title XII, Committee on Veterans Affairs, H.R. 5376, Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57604
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
"
Budget authority reflects appropriations specifically provided in title XII or amounts estimated by CBO.
The costs of title XII fall within budget function 700 (veterans' benefits and services).
Title XII would not increase on-budget deficits after 2031.
Title XII contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
"
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title X, Committee on Small Business, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57605
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
"
Estimates for title X reflect the passage of H.R. 3684, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
Budget authority reflects appropriations specifically provided in this title or amounts estimated by CBO.
The costs of title X fall within budget function 370 (commerce and housing credit).
SBIC = small business investment company.
Title X would not increase on-budget deficits after 2031.
Title X contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
"
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title XII, Committee on Veterans Affairs, H.R. 5376, Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57604
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
"
Budget authority reflects appropriations specifically provided in title XII or amounts estimated by CBO.
The costs of title XII fall within budget function 700 (veterans' benefits and services).
Title XII would not increase on-budget deficits after 2031.
Title XII contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
"
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title X, Committee on Small Business, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57605
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
"
Estimates for title X reflect the passage of H.R. 3684, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
Budget authority reflects appropriations specifically provided in this title or amounts estimated by CBO.
The costs of title X fall within budget function 370 (commerce and housing credit).
SBIC = small business investment company.
Title X would not increase on-budget deficits after 2031.
Title X contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
"
Redigert 10.11.2021 kl 20:29
Du må logge inn for å svare
Bob Macahan
10.11.2021 kl 19:28
10522
Det kommer krävas en hel del för att övertyga Manchin. Han använder inflationen för att pressa sina partikamrater Det är han som håller kursen på REC nere.
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/580910-manchin-lawmakers-can-no-longer-ignore-inflation
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/580910-manchin-lawmakers-can-no-longer-ignore-inflation
Bob Macahan
10.11.2021 kl 19:31
10506
CBO uttalande måste väl ändå bara kunna tolkas som positivt 😃
Håll oss uppdaterade manman. Din insats är mycket uppskattad!
Håll oss uppdaterade manman. Din insats är mycket uppskattad!
manman01
10.11.2021 kl 20:25
10311
Helt enig :)
Dette skal nok blive godt!!
Som der står i linket du delte (mange tak for at dele!!)
"
..
"Seventeen Nobel Prize winners in economics have said that my plan will 'ease inflationary pressures.' And my plan does this without raising taxes on those making less than $400,000 or adding to the federal debt," Biden said in a statement.
"
Det er ikke uden grund, det bliver gentaget gang på gang på gang, at pakken vil gavne økonomien
Stort tak til dig også, Bob! Det er en fornøjelse :)
(Og alle for at læse med :) )
Dette skal nok blive godt!!
Som der står i linket du delte (mange tak for at dele!!)
"
..
"Seventeen Nobel Prize winners in economics have said that my plan will 'ease inflationary pressures.' And my plan does this without raising taxes on those making less than $400,000 or adding to the federal debt," Biden said in a statement.
"
Det er ikke uden grund, det bliver gentaget gang på gang på gang, at pakken vil gavne økonomien
Stort tak til dig også, Bob! Det er en fornøjelse :)
(Og alle for at læse med :) )
Redigert 10.11.2021 kl 20:27
Du må logge inn for å svare
manman01
10.11.2021 kl 20:27
10307
En mere :)
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title V, Committee on Homeland Security, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57607
NOVEMBER 10, 2021"
"
SUMMARY
Estimates for title V reflect the passage of H.R. 3684, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
Budget authority reflects appropriations specifically provided in title V or amounts estimated by CBO.
The costs of title V fall within budget functions 050 (national defense), 450 (community and regional development), and 750 (administration of justice).
CBO estimates the Department of Homeland Security will not spend all of the budget authority provided in Sections 50001 and 50004.
Title V would not increase on-budget deficits after 2031.
Title V contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
"
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title V, Committee on Homeland Security, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57607
NOVEMBER 10, 2021"
"
SUMMARY
Estimates for title V reflect the passage of H.R. 3684, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
Budget authority reflects appropriations specifically provided in title V or amounts estimated by CBO.
The costs of title V fall within budget functions 050 (national defense), 450 (community and regional development), and 750 (administration of justice).
CBO estimates the Department of Homeland Security will not spend all of the budget authority provided in Sections 50001 and 50004.
Title V would not increase on-budget deficits after 2031.
Title V contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
"
Redigert 10.11.2021 kl 20:29
Du må logge inn for å svare
Vel. Leser du om BBB nå, er det de som påstår den vil øke inflasjonen og så har du President Biden og likesinnede som sier den vil redusere inflasjonen.
Her blir det liv!!
Her blir det liv!!
Bullinvestor
10.11.2021 kl 22:01
9971
Ja professor økonomene snakker om inflasjon og høy gjeld for mange land og de mener at USA har alt for mye gjeld. USA skal vel ikke sitte på gjerde å ikke ta opp lån nu når verden har en siste mulighet til å nå 1,5 graders målet. Selvfølgelig skaper det inflasjon men har vi noe annet valg? jeg tror ikke det. Er kanskje litt overtroisk jeg tror det kommer til å gå bra.
manman01
10.11.2021 kl 22:03
9980
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title IX, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57608
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
"
SUMMARY
CBO estimates that enacting this title would result in direct spending outlays totaling $9.3 billion over the 2022-2031 period.
Estimates for title IX reflect the passage of H.R. 3684, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
Budget authority reflects appropriations specifically provided in title IX or amounts estimated by CBO.
The costs of title IX fall within budget functions 250 (general science, space, and technology), 270 (energy), 300 (natural resources and environment), 370 (commerce and housing credit), 400 (transportation), and 450 (community and regional development).
DOE = Department of Energy; NASA = National Aeronautics and Space Administration; NIST = National Institute of Standards and Technology; NSF = National Science Foundation; PFAS = perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances; * = between zero and $500,000.
Title IX would not increase on-budget deficits after 2031.
Title IX contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
"
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57608
NOVEMBER 10, 2021
"
SUMMARY
CBO estimates that enacting this title would result in direct spending outlays totaling $9.3 billion over the 2022-2031 period.
Estimates for title IX reflect the passage of H.R. 3684, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
Budget authority reflects appropriations specifically provided in title IX or amounts estimated by CBO.
The costs of title IX fall within budget functions 250 (general science, space, and technology), 270 (energy), 300 (natural resources and environment), 370 (commerce and housing credit), 400 (transportation), and 450 (community and regional development).
DOE = Department of Energy; NASA = National Aeronautics and Space Administration; NIST = National Institute of Standards and Technology; NSF = National Science Foundation; PFAS = perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances; * = between zero and $500,000.
Title IX would not increase on-budget deficits after 2031.
Title IX contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
"
Dette bør være nok til å godta pakken.
Min personlige mening sider fullstendig med Biden. Fornybart er ikke en straff på folket tvert i mot en nødvendighet. Det er en lettelse og enklere fremtid for de som bor i USA. Høyere kvalitets jobber som er bedre for individene og betaler langt bedre. Dette er nødvendig og det er kjempe viktig at USA investerer for fremtiden og viser vei til resten av planeten. Faktisk, glem det å vise vei for ett sekund. Dette er såpass viktig for befolkningen i USA og vil påvirke så mange liv på positiv måte... jeg gidder ikke å utdype meg om hvorfor dette er nødvendig for nasjonal sikkerhet heller, fordi skrevet noveller om det her. Jeg ELSKER hva Biden og hans administrasjon gjør og har så mye respekt for mennesker som gjør det som er best for menneskeheten (SUBJEKTIV MENING).
Politikere vil alltid snakke mye tull. Noen ganger vet de selv at de snakker tull, men de gjør det likevel. Hvordan folk har så ulike oppfatninger er alltid spennende. Er såpass mye byråkrati og unødvendigheter at dere ikke vil høre min personlig mening om dette. Det blir nok for PG-18, hehe. Jeg stopper her fordi jeg føler at jeg kommer til å bli angrepet hvis jeg sier noe mer, haha.
Fornybart er og som jeg alltid har sagt; uunngåelig og neste steg i vår evolusjon på hvordan vi bruker denne planetens energi og ressurser. Meh, skulle bare ønske at vi levde lengde nok til å kunne oppleve mer av menneskehetens utvikling og fremtid. Type III fra Kardashev scale hadde vært noe, eller hva?
Redigert: Det ble litt personlig og veldig off topic. God natt :)
Politikere vil alltid snakke mye tull. Noen ganger vet de selv at de snakker tull, men de gjør det likevel. Hvordan folk har så ulike oppfatninger er alltid spennende. Er såpass mye byråkrati og unødvendigheter at dere ikke vil høre min personlig mening om dette. Det blir nok for PG-18, hehe. Jeg stopper her fordi jeg føler at jeg kommer til å bli angrepet hvis jeg sier noe mer, haha.
Fornybart er og som jeg alltid har sagt; uunngåelig og neste steg i vår evolusjon på hvordan vi bruker denne planetens energi og ressurser. Meh, skulle bare ønske at vi levde lengde nok til å kunne oppleve mer av menneskehetens utvikling og fremtid. Type III fra Kardashev scale hadde vært noe, eller hva?
Redigert: Det ble litt personlig og veldig off topic. God natt :)
Redigert 10.11.2021 kl 23:04
Du må logge inn for å svare
Oli
11.11.2021 kl 00:04
9378
Man skal ikke heller glemme at kapitalister ser på det grønne skiftet som en måte å skape økonomisk vekst. På noen områder betaler man mer for mindre men det er et "nødvendig' skifte så da er ikke det så farlig. Mange demokrater ser nok på dette som en god mulighet for USA til å ta tilbake litt av makta de har mistet de siste 20 årene. Bli ledende på fornybart og dermed skape en helt ny storindustri i landet er nok en visjon blant mange.
Om de klarer det er fortsatt vanskelig å si men man kan skimte konturen av noe. Jeg tror også at etter covid så innså mange land at de var altfor avhengige av Kina derfor tror jeg en del industri vil flyttes hjem. Særlig USA tror jeg innser at de kan tjene på det. Om det er bra for verdensøkonomien generelt kan nok diskuteres men jeg tror dette kommer til å være noe vi ser mer av de neste årene.
Om de klarer det er fortsatt vanskelig å si men man kan skimte konturen av noe. Jeg tror også at etter covid så innså mange land at de var altfor avhengige av Kina derfor tror jeg en del industri vil flyttes hjem. Særlig USA tror jeg innser at de kan tjene på det. Om det er bra for verdensøkonomien generelt kan nok diskuteres men jeg tror dette kommer til å være noe vi ser mer av de neste årene.
Redigert 11.11.2021 kl 00:05
Du må logge inn for å svare
manman01
12.11.2021 kl 22:26
8493
Så er den næste ude
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title XI, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57490
NOVEMBER 12, 2021
"
CBO estimates that enacting this title would result in direct spending outlays totaling $36 billion over the 2022-2031 period.
Estimates for title XI reflect the passage of H.R. 3684, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
Budget authority reflects appropriations specifically provided in title XI or amounts estimated by CBO.
The costs of title XI fall within budget functions 300 (natural resources and environment), 400 (transportation), 450 (community and regional development), and 800 (general government).
a. CBO estimates that the affected agencies would not spend all of the budget authority provided in this section.
b. Section 110001 would appropriate $10 billion to make competitive grants for transit infrastructure in low-income communities; CBO estimates outlays from that appropriation would total $8.75 billion over the 2022-2031 period. The section also would limit the availability of funds already available for similar transit infrastructure programs in fiscal years 2025 and 2026. CBO estimates that limitation would reduce spending of amounts provided in 2025 and 2026 relative to the baseline budget projections, as updated by the passage of H.R. 3684, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, by $263 million over the 2022-2031 period. Thus, on net, CBO estimates outlays would total roughly $8.5 billion.
c. Section 110017 would authorize the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to provide financial incentives to recipients of disaster assistance to cover the additional costs of enhanced building materials, such as concrete and steel, that reduce greenhouse gas emissions relative to traditionally manufactured versions of those materials. The section would authorize FEMA to provide such incentives through 2026. Although the section would not provide additional budget authority, CBO estimates that the provision would increase direct spending by $128 million over the 2022-2031 period because the authority would result in the spending of balances from the Disaster Relief Fund that otherwise would go unspent during that period.
Title XI would not increase on-budget deficits after 2031.
Title XI would impose intergovernmental and private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) by requiring entities to meet greenhouse gas performance targets. The cost of the mandates would depend on regulations yet to be published, and therefore, CBO cannot determine whether the costs would exceed the thresholds established in UMRA for intergovernmental and private-sector mandates ($85 million and $170 million in 2021, respectively, adjusted annually for inflation).
"
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title XI, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57490
NOVEMBER 12, 2021
"
CBO estimates that enacting this title would result in direct spending outlays totaling $36 billion over the 2022-2031 period.
Estimates for title XI reflect the passage of H.R. 3684, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
Budget authority reflects appropriations specifically provided in title XI or amounts estimated by CBO.
The costs of title XI fall within budget functions 300 (natural resources and environment), 400 (transportation), 450 (community and regional development), and 800 (general government).
a. CBO estimates that the affected agencies would not spend all of the budget authority provided in this section.
b. Section 110001 would appropriate $10 billion to make competitive grants for transit infrastructure in low-income communities; CBO estimates outlays from that appropriation would total $8.75 billion over the 2022-2031 period. The section also would limit the availability of funds already available for similar transit infrastructure programs in fiscal years 2025 and 2026. CBO estimates that limitation would reduce spending of amounts provided in 2025 and 2026 relative to the baseline budget projections, as updated by the passage of H.R. 3684, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, by $263 million over the 2022-2031 period. Thus, on net, CBO estimates outlays would total roughly $8.5 billion.
c. Section 110017 would authorize the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to provide financial incentives to recipients of disaster assistance to cover the additional costs of enhanced building materials, such as concrete and steel, that reduce greenhouse gas emissions relative to traditionally manufactured versions of those materials. The section would authorize FEMA to provide such incentives through 2026. Although the section would not provide additional budget authority, CBO estimates that the provision would increase direct spending by $128 million over the 2022-2031 period because the authority would result in the spending of balances from the Disaster Relief Fund that otherwise would go unspent during that period.
Title XI would not increase on-budget deficits after 2031.
Title XI would impose intergovernmental and private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) by requiring entities to meet greenhouse gas performance targets. The cost of the mandates would depend on regulations yet to be published, and therefore, CBO cannot determine whether the costs would exceed the thresholds established in UMRA for intergovernmental and private-sector mandates ($85 million and $170 million in 2021, respectively, adjusted annually for inflation).
"
manman01
13.11.2021 kl 08:31
7943
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title VIII, Committee on Oversight and Reform, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57611
NOVEMBER 12, 2021
"
CBO estimates that enacting this title would result in direct spending outlays totaling $13.8 billion over the 2022-2031 period.
Estimates for title VIII reflect the passage of H.R. 3684, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
Budget authority reflects appropriations specifically provided in title VIII or amounts estimated by CBO.
The costs of title VIII fall within budget function 370 (commerce and housing credit) and 800 (general government).
* = between zero and $500,000.
a. Postal Service cash flows are recorded in the federal budget in the Postal Service Fund and are classified as off-budget. The legislation would transfer funds from the Treasury to the Postal Service Fund; that transfer would be classified as an on-budget transaction.
Title VIII would not increase on-budget deficits after 2031.
Title VIII contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
"
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57611
NOVEMBER 12, 2021
"
CBO estimates that enacting this title would result in direct spending outlays totaling $13.8 billion over the 2022-2031 period.
Estimates for title VIII reflect the passage of H.R. 3684, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
Budget authority reflects appropriations specifically provided in title VIII or amounts estimated by CBO.
The costs of title VIII fall within budget function 370 (commerce and housing credit) and 800 (general government).
* = between zero and $500,000.
a. Postal Service cash flows are recorded in the federal budget in the Postal Service Fund and are classified as off-budget. The legislation would transfer funds from the Treasury to the Postal Service Fund; that transfer would be classified as an on-budget transaction.
Title VIII would not increase on-budget deficits after 2031.
Title VIII contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
"
Hobbydansken
13.11.2021 kl 10:44
7540
Innlegg flyttet til riktig tråd: https://finansavisen.no/forum/thread/131735/view/3956057
Redigert 13.11.2021 kl 11:58
Du må logge inn for å svare
Skalleknarp
13.11.2021 kl 11:16
7396
Bare et spørsmål. Det er mye eder og galle mot shorterne her på HO. Joda jeg slenger ut noen fraser selv i ny og ne. Uansett ser det ut som om de historisk har hatt rimelig god kontroll på sakene uansett hvor mye vi hauser. De klarer å smyge inn dekningen uten stor dramatikk. Spørsmålet er om de vil klare dette NÅR BBB pakken blir signert og RECSI i tillegg til å annonsere åpning av ML også drar opp noen skikkelige store kaniner fra hatten. Hva da? Hvor går vi da?
Redigert 13.11.2021 kl 11:17
Du må logge inn for å svare
Patron72
13.11.2021 kl 11:23
7372
Drit i shorterne
Det eneste som teller er å få gode meldinger fra selskapet.
Når det gjelder pakken vi venter på vil den mest sannsynlig sette fortgang i prosessene.
Spennende tid vi har i møte 👍
Det eneste som teller er å få gode meldinger fra selskapet.
Når det gjelder pakken vi venter på vil den mest sannsynlig sette fortgang i prosessene.
Spennende tid vi har i møte 👍
Det bygger seg opp til å bli en spennende avslutning på 2021. Det begynner å bli en lang liste for REC, samarbeidspartnere, potensielle kunder og allianser. Alle virker tilsynelatende å vente på Herr Manchin & Co.
Spørs om det ikke blir litt lange kvelder:
The House and Senate have one more week before the week-long Thanksgiving recess and will return several days before must-pass deadlines like government funding and a debt ceiling increase on Dec. 3 in addition to tackling the annual defense funding bill. After that, Congress will have only one week left before the year is up for the Christmas and New Year's break.
Democrats will be in crunch time to get it all done over the three weeks they're still in session – unless the schedule is extended – or potentially face dealing with half of Biden's agenda in 2022 just months before voting begins in the midterm elections.
Spørs om det ikke blir litt lange kvelder:
The House and Senate have one more week before the week-long Thanksgiving recess and will return several days before must-pass deadlines like government funding and a debt ceiling increase on Dec. 3 in addition to tackling the annual defense funding bill. After that, Congress will have only one week left before the year is up for the Christmas and New Year's break.
Democrats will be in crunch time to get it all done over the three weeks they're still in session – unless the schedule is extended – or potentially face dealing with half of Biden's agenda in 2022 just months before voting begins in the midterm elections.
Er noen millioner aksjer short i rec, men ikke bry deg om de. Er ikke shorten som skal sørge for rec blir repriset. I løpet av 7 uker kommer selvskapet med en melding om oppstart av moses lake og da begynner turen mot 100 lappen. Par år så har du gjort gode penger fra dagens kurs
Tenkt på hvor vi går om BBB ikke går gjennom? Eller det ikke kommer noen kaniner opp av hatten?
(Og ja, jeg har en Haug av aksjer i REC)
(Og ja, jeg har en Haug av aksjer i REC)
Da må det ha kommet en ny svarte dau. Ja det er viktig å være realistisk :-)
VL
13.11.2021 kl 12:08
7481
Da går vi mest sannsynlig sidelengs til det skjer noe konkret. TT har jo også sagt det, med BBB så dundre vi fremover og uten BBB så går vi sakte fremover.
Marketwatch
13.11.2021 kl 20:39
6838
Ville vært utrolig flaut for Biden og Kelly dersom ihverfall fornybardelen i BBB ikke går igjennom. De har vel gått for høyt ut på banen i Glaskov til at det kan skje, eller - hvem vet hvor høna sparker i amerikansk politikk? Uansett kommer det en "made in US" linje for sol og batteri som strekker seg fra råstoff til ferdig produkt. Når fornybart nå skal fases inn i stor stil, er det utenkelig at USA som stormakt, skal fortsette å være avhengig av leveranser fra Kina og andre land for å nå sine mål for energiforsyningen. Det kommer derfor til å skje noe som har stor betydning for REC uansett, men ikke før BBB er avklart, enten de går for subsidier eller ikke. Uten subsidier må det innføres ytterligere restriksjoner på import, ellers vil det ikke være mulig (ihverfall i oppstartsfasen) å konkurrere mot subsidierte produkter fra Kina etc.
Stonks_
14.11.2021 kl 03:47
6150
på tide å kjøpe noen out of money call opsjoner for mars neste år, så er det egentlig bare å vente. lito bet på BBB pakken haha
Desember for Build Back Better:
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/14/schumer-schedule-reconciliation-bill-521931
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/14/schumer-schedule-reconciliation-bill-521931
manman01
15.11.2021 kl 21:31
4674
(BLOG) CBO to Release a Complete Cost Estimate for H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act, by November 19
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57616
NOVEMBER 15, 2021
"
The Congressional Budget Office anticipates publishing a complete cost estimate for H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act (Rules Committee Print 117-18 incorporating a manager’s amendment by Congressman Yarmuth), by the end of the day on Friday, November 19. The estimate will be published on CBO’s website.
CBO also began publishing estimates for individual titles of the bill on November 10 and has published six so far. The remaining seven estimates will be published this week as follows:
Monday, November 15—Title I, Committee on Agriculture; Title IV, Committee on Financial Services.
By Friday, November 19—Title II, Committee on Education and Labor; Title III, Committee on Energy and Commerce; Title VI, Committee on the Judiciary; Title VII, Committee on Natural Resources; and Title XIII, Committee on Ways and Means.
"
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57616
NOVEMBER 15, 2021
"
The Congressional Budget Office anticipates publishing a complete cost estimate for H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act (Rules Committee Print 117-18 incorporating a manager’s amendment by Congressman Yarmuth), by the end of the day on Friday, November 19. The estimate will be published on CBO’s website.
CBO also began publishing estimates for individual titles of the bill on November 10 and has published six so far. The remaining seven estimates will be published this week as follows:
Monday, November 15—Title I, Committee on Agriculture; Title IV, Committee on Financial Services.
By Friday, November 19—Title II, Committee on Education and Labor; Title III, Committee on Energy and Commerce; Title VI, Committee on the Judiciary; Title VII, Committee on Natural Resources; and Title XIII, Committee on Ways and Means.
"
Redigert 15.11.2021 kl 21:32
Du må logge inn for å svare
manman01
15.11.2021 kl 23:07
4416
Havde lige overset disse :)
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title I, Committee on Agriculture, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57618
NOVEMBER 15, 2021
"
CBO estimates that enacting this title would result in direct spending outlays totaling $76.9 billion over the 2022-2031 period.
This estimate is based on language in two documents, which are available from the House Committee on Rules:
Rules Committee Print 117-18, Text of H.R. 5376, Build Back Better Act
Rules Committee Print 117-18, Yarmuth Amendment 112
"
https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-117HR5376RH-RCP117-18.pdf
https://amendments-rules.house.gov/amendments/YARMUT_024_xml211104220514322.pdf
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title IV, Committee on Financial Services, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57619
NOVEMBER 15, 2021
"
CBO estimates that enacting this title would result in a net increase in the deficit totaling $150.7 billion over the 2022-2031 period. That increase in the deficit would result from an increase in direct spending of $151.5 billion and an increase in revenues of $0.8 billion.
This estimate is based on language in two documents, which are available from the House Committee on Rules:
"
https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-117HR5376RH-RCP117-18.pdf
https://amendments-rules.house.gov/amendments/YARMUT_024_xml211104220514322.pdf
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title I, Committee on Agriculture, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57618
NOVEMBER 15, 2021
"
CBO estimates that enacting this title would result in direct spending outlays totaling $76.9 billion over the 2022-2031 period.
This estimate is based on language in two documents, which are available from the House Committee on Rules:
Rules Committee Print 117-18, Text of H.R. 5376, Build Back Better Act
Rules Committee Print 117-18, Yarmuth Amendment 112
"
https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-117HR5376RH-RCP117-18.pdf
https://amendments-rules.house.gov/amendments/YARMUT_024_xml211104220514322.pdf
Estimated Budgetary Effects of Title IV, Committee on Financial Services, H.R. 5376, the Build Back Better Act
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57619
NOVEMBER 15, 2021
"
CBO estimates that enacting this title would result in a net increase in the deficit totaling $150.7 billion over the 2022-2031 period. That increase in the deficit would result from an increase in direct spending of $151.5 billion and an increase in revenues of $0.8 billion.
This estimate is based on language in two documents, which are available from the House Committee on Rules:
"
https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-117HR5376RH-RCP117-18.pdf
https://amendments-rules.house.gov/amendments/YARMUT_024_xml211104220514322.pdf
Fra thehill i dag
The second ranking House Democrat said Tuesday that party leaders are aiming to vote on President Biden's $1.75 trillion climate and social spending package on Thursday or Friday.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said "most of" the floor debate on the massive reconciliation package, known as the Build Back Better Act, will occur on Wednesday.
"And then I expect a vote on the Build Back Better final passage, at the earliest Thursday, and at hopefully the latest on Friday," Hoyer said on a press call
The second ranking House Democrat said Tuesday that party leaders are aiming to vote on President Biden's $1.75 trillion climate and social spending package on Thursday or Friday.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said "most of" the floor debate on the massive reconciliation package, known as the Build Back Better Act, will occur on Wednesday.
"And then I expect a vote on the Build Back Better final passage, at the earliest Thursday, and at hopefully the latest on Friday," Hoyer said on a press call
Mye fram og tilbake med BBB, så venter til jeg ser/ men supert om det stemmer👍
Luis.hern
17.11.2021 kl 09:38
3091
har jeg skjønt det riktig... bbb pakken behandles på Torsdag- Fredag?